<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Reason for God.  Tim Keller.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.2sparrows.org/2009/11/13/the-reason-for-god-tim-keller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.2sparrows.org/2009/11/13/the-reason-for-god-tim-keller/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proper Confidence. Lesslie Newbigin. &#171; 2sparrows</title>
		<link>http://blog.2sparrows.org/2009/11/13/the-reason-for-god-tim-keller/#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Proper Confidence. Lesslie Newbigin. &#171; 2sparrows]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.2sparrows.org/?p=1555#comment-1683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Newbigin then follows Western thought through Kant, and Kant&#8217;s arguments for God and ultimate reality based on moral and aesthetic experience.  And through the Enlightenment (The Age of Reason), where our view (humanity&#8217;s) became that Reason is the only path to reliable knowledge.  (In Deep Church, Belcher talks about Foundationalism, and that was the 1st time when I started to be able to put into words what I had felt for some time &#8212; that we sometimes need something beyond Reason &#8212; to describe things such as certainly in Faith. (But then again, there is a problem with &#8220;Faith without Doubt&#8230;&#8221;) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Newbigin then follows Western thought through Kant, and Kant&#8217;s arguments for God and ultimate reality based on moral and aesthetic experience.  And through the Enlightenment (The Age of Reason), where our view (humanity&#8217;s) became that Reason is the only path to reliable knowledge.  (In Deep Church, Belcher talks about Foundationalism, and that was the 1st time when I started to be able to put into words what I had felt for some time &#8212; that we sometimes need something beyond Reason &#8212; to describe things such as certainly in Faith. (But then again, there is a problem with &#8220;Faith without Doubt&#8230;&#8221;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonymulqueen</title>
		<link>http://blog.2sparrows.org/2009/11/13/the-reason-for-god-tim-keller/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tonymulqueen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.2sparrows.org/?p=1555#comment-1652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Linked to from my blog on isms (under Fideism: http://ismoftheday.com/2010/12/22/fideism/). Thanks for these observations, which are a great expression of the argument for faith.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linked to from my blog on isms (under Fideism: <a href="http://ismoftheday.com/2010/12/22/fideism/" rel="nofollow">http://ismoftheday.com/2010/12/22/fideism/</a>). Thanks for these observations, which are a great expression of the argument for faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

