2sparrows

I guess if I’m going to post the good results, I might as well post the bad ones. But this one does come with a caveat.

I again ran the Red course when I had 1st intended to run Green. Normally Red is the longest, and Green the 2nd longest. Every once in a while there is a Blue, which is a 1-2 Km longer than a red. Since there was again a blue, I decided to run red instead of green.

Anyway, after finishing 2nd on red last month, this month’s result was dissappointing to say the least. I was running well, but navigation was not quite right. I waisted a lot of time on control #5 and was about to give up, but decided to attack it from the lake, rather than the road trail intersection, which is probably what I should have done from the beginning. Once I found it, I was back on track, and got 6 and 7 easily. But 8 was another matter. After spending much too much time looking for it, another racer came up, and together we still could not find it. We finally decided to bail. He decided to go on to 9, 10, and 11, and I decided to just call it a day. I had already been out almost 2 hours and saw it was nearing 3 p.m., which is when the courses are normally cut off.

So I headed back in, splitting between 9 and 10, and going to the finish. I got there and told them I was a DNF due to #8, and they said no one had gotten it, and it had likely been taken by someone! So if I had actually gotten 9, 10 and 11, I would not have been a DNF. Based on the distance left for those controls, I probably would have come in around 2 hours and 20 minutes if all had gone ok.

So the moral of the story is, don’t spend too much time on one control when it is pretty obvious you are in the right spot, and always finish the course, even if you do bail on one.

I finished this at least a month ago, and really should have written about it then. But I’ve been busy and neglected it until now.

For most of the book, “pain” should be re-labeled “suffering” for our modern usage, but at times our use of physical pain is also included. Lewis summarizes the problem as follows:

If God were good, He would wish to make His creatures perfectly happy, and if God were almighty He would be able to do what He wished. But the creatures are not happy. Therefore God lacks either goodness, or power, or both.”

Then throughout the book he explores all aspects of suffering and how that relates to beliefe in an omniscient, omnipotent, benevolent, God. His main argument is that Man suffers because of original sin, and that original sin really comes down to “turning from God to self.” I won’t go into more detail than that here, but I do think the book is well worth the read. It is not as exciting to read as something like the Screwtape Letters, reviewed here, but it is still very good.

Here’s my normal list of quotes and thoughts on some of them:

• I found this one interesting as it is something different that you’d likely here most present day pastor’s say. Lewis was not necessarily a theologin, at least a trained one, but I always find his insight very well formulated and often right.
  

  And I certainly think that Christ, in the flesh, was not omniscient, if only because a human brain could not, presumably, be the vehicle of omniscient consciousness, and to say that Our Lord’s thinking was not really conditioned by the size and shape of his brain might be to deny the real incarnation…

• I found his discussion of eternity as something I had not really thought of before. I guess it is hard, or maybe impossible, to grasp eternity, because of how we typically view time as a line… Here is what he had to say:
  

  If we think of time as a line — which is a good image, because the parts of time are successive and no two of them can co-exist; i.e. there is no width in time, only length — we probably ought to think of eternity as a plane or even a solid. Thus the whole reality of a human being would be represented by a solid figure. That solid would be mainly the work of God, acting through grace and nature, but human free will would have contributed the base-line which we call the earthly life: and if you draw your base-line askew, the whole solid will be in the wrong place. The fact that life is short, or, in the symbol, that we contribute only one little line to the whole complex figure, might be regarded as a Divine mercy. For if even the drawing of that little line, left to our free will, is sometimes so badly done as to spoil the whole, how much worse a mess might we have made of the figure if more had been entrusted to us.

• But if suffering is good, ought it not to be pursued rather than avoided? I answer that suffering is not good in itself. What is good in any painful experience is, for the sufferer, his submission to the will of God, and, for the spectators, the compassion aroused and the acts of mercy to which it leads.

• I’ve never been into fasting, but recently, I’ve read several things on it that have made me think about it in new ways. I’m not ready to do it yet, but my mind is certainly thinking about it.
  

  Fasting asserts the will against the appetite — the reward being self-mastery and the danger pride…

• The spectacle of the universe as revealed by experience can never have been the ground of religion: it must always have been something in spite of which religion, acquired from a different source, was held.

• I have been trying to make the believe that we actually are, at present, creatures whose character must be, in some respects, a horrot to God, as it is, when we really see it, a horror to ourselves.

• On God’s love for Man… (Or really, any beings love for another…)
  

  Love, by definition, seeks to enjoy its object.

I had many other dog-eared quotes in the book, but I won’t bore you anymore with them.

I borrowed this from my Dad’s collection of outdoor adventure type books a long time ago, but finally got around to reading it. It is really all about the sport, and there is almost no navigation technique in it. For someone totally new to orienteering, it can teach you a lot about where the sport comes from, variations on it, gear, etc. But there is no real map and compass skill taught. The appendix in the back that lists all the map symbols and control descriptions is great, though.